7/18/2005
What did I think of the book?...I enjoyed it immensely -- why?...That is a good question. It could be that the book was enjoyable because of my fondness for the previous five, but I think the reason for liking this book goes beyond that. The overarching plot remains the same: destroy/stop Lord Voldemort, but the overall feel of the book was different. This book seemed to make many connections, answer many questions that I had been hoping it would,yet there was not the usual plot to be solved...a philosopher's stone, a prophecy, a diary. The feel was very much that of the fourth book when Lord Voldemort returns. It is a dark, depressing book -- conditions in the wizarding world and the muggle world are growing worse; the Death Eaters are triumphing without many getting caught at all -- in fact only one or so at the end of the book. For those who haven't read it yet, I won't give away who the Prince is or which main character dies, but both elements leave many unanswered questions still to be answered in the next book. If you like mystery, betrayal, love, trust, the thematic battle between good and evil, and the magic of fantasy this book is for you. Although I recommend reading the other books first or you may find yourself really lost at times. If you've been wondering about Tom Riddle's past, why he's not dead yet, then this book aids in understanding his character. But this book does not have a happy ending. There is no stopping Voldemort or the Death Eaters in this book...in fact they are the ultimate winners in this book.
Many questions have still not been answered, and I doubt many of them will be in the next book...allowing the audience to fill in holes for themselves is a great rhetorical strategy.
When I have more time I'll give a more in depth review, but time is short right now...
7/19/2005
I've thought more about the book and looked over a few sections that really stand out to me and make the book worth reading. The conversations between Harry and Dumbledore, especially in Chapter 23 Horcruxes, indicate Rowling's difference between good and evil. What makes Harry different? His love...but why is that such a special thing...because Voldemort never could, never did, can never understand. He has 'torn' himself too many times to understand or even feel the way a human being, a wizard can.
What would you do for immortality? Would you kill? Would you rely on someone, something else? Would you try to achieve it yourself?
Are friends a crucial part of your life? Another difference between Voldemort and Harry is that Harry is surrounded by real friends willing to die for him out of love for him...if Voldemort's servants (not friends) find that he can never induce fear into them again, never come back to punish them (kill them) will they still die for him? Fear is a powerful tool to control others, as is seen time and time again throughout history, but it is not everlasting when it is a mortal (in this case a wizard) inducing it...
What benefit is there to a soul that's whole rather than one that has been split into pieces?
What role does human/wizard autonomy play when an evil source relies too heavily on prophecy?
Why must Harry kill Voldemort? Because Voldemort makes it necessary for Harry to try...what is the significance? What advantage does Harry have? Self-sacrificial Love? A whole soul? Friends? The self-sacrificial love of friends? Meaningful relationships? Motivation?
Despite Harry's horrible past experiences he still has the ability to love...unlike Voldemort who finds it weak and without power.
What then is power, true power...I'll ask Dumbledore...
I have greatly enjoyed the development of the characters in the Harry Potter books, which has made much of the difference for me...The characters are dynamic, interacting with the setting and each other to animate the story...
An overarching good battling evil is always a good, linear story-telling (rhetorical) strategy that portrays certain key themes and ideas that an author wants to convey (truth).
What is Dumbledore's purpose in the books? To be the protector of good? Harry's mentor? A symbol of hope? To convey that no wizard is infallible?
Who is Severus Snape? What is his motivation? This current book was not altogether clear for me on this issue...
The story-telling strategy is typical of many great books, but still effective as it takes a different twist and revolves around different characters. Prince finishes with evil seeming to overshadow all that is good, though hopeful Harry remains with his friends. The theme is similar to that of Lord of the Rings, the Chronicles of Narnia, and other such books.
It is too bad that the Harry Potter books have caused somewhat of a religious discrepancy in communities, when it conveys much of the same truth as Christian literature...
As I think more about this, I'll post periodically...right now my new project is researching and exegeting the epistle to the Romans in comparison with the other audiences to which Paul writes to in his other letters...chow, much explicating to be done...